Mark McAulay

Digital Guy 
« Back to blog

UX - what the hell is it and who's responsible?

For quite some time now, the phrase "User Experience" has been bandied about in web design and development discussions and to be honest, I've not personally understood exactly what was meant or indeed, seen it be challenged. To start with, what is it? what does user experience or "UX" actually mean to designer, developer or client? This is actually an integral part of any design and development process. It deals with the way in which a user interacts with your design, be that a product, a printed piece or a website. Of course my eyes, interest and focus of this post are on the latter of these.

A recent question on twitter highlighted some interesting responses, all of which are correct in their own way and all have given me a much better understanding of what exactly we're talking about here. As far as I can see, this goes deep into the process of web design and definitely involves a post I've not finished writing yet but I think i'm just going to publish this now and let the other post fill in any gaps i see a little later.

My initial question on twitter was "Ok, I need to say this. What you call "user experience" or "UX"...you mean "web design" in old money, don't you?" and what I was getting at was the way a website looks and functions is as important as its visual appearance and as integral to its success. As far as I can see, a website built on aesthetics alone is pretty yes, but (barring a bit of luck) not exactly the model of usability for its end user and may lead to a poor experience whether through unintuitive navigation, unstructured content, confusing calls to action and so on and so forth. The discussion sparked into life and a few genuinely good points came out in the course of this. The one thing I wanted to clarify is still open though. who's job is it? designer, developer or "UX designer" which is one of the reasons I started asking questions because in my 10+ years of web design, I'd never heard of a "UX designer" until recently. Forgive my questioning nature but if something is involved in the industry I love, I want to know all about it, who's involved and what makes it breathe.

The responses given put the field of user experience somewhere between a design thats not been thought of outside an aesthetic concern and an unexpected bit of work a developer has to deal with because nobody else has paid any attention to it. Fair points as far as I can see. Again, my concern is with who's really responsible for this and in my own opinion, this responsibility lies with both designer and developer and more importantly, where the two merge. Functionality and ease of functionality exists within both disciplines at the same time. I believe the reason that UX has become the upstart issue that it is, is through designers not knowing which functionality is possible and through developers not knowing if certain functionality actually makes sense in a design. Both parties are responsible for its direction and execution.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this as it's an issue that needs much more exploration IMHO

Comments (5)

Jan 18, 2010
Ryan Roberts said...
As you know I think it's a mixed responsibility of everyone involved (designer, developer, copywriter…) assuming they have a thorough knowledge of their role, the web in general and user interaction.

I can see a UX Specialist coming in useful when the situation is far from ideal. Maybe the designers and developers just don't have the time to concentrate enough. Or maybe the company in general lacks understanding to pull it all together.

A dedicated UX Specialist may also come in useful regarding experimentation, learning and opening up the area to become something better understood.

But in general I see it as something you cannot separate from "design" when that design is "used" by a person or even a machine. Fundamentally it lies with the designer*. And by designer I don't mean someone who simply creates pretty websites or visuals.

Jan 18, 2010
gra_design said...
Sounds like someone's made up a job for themselves, to be a "First!" gah!
It sounds like a branding exercise...someone that ensures the users get the "holistic blue sky visioneered" experience?
but, I can see how tight control over UI, Branding and usability might make this term "UX"...
I think, so long as your "users" are not confused or condescended, then the "UX" is working?
Jan 18, 2010
scharlau said...
Mark,

from what you write it's kinda like 'information architect' (IA), something everyone needs to be able to do a bit of, and consider, but unless you're with a big firm, chances are you're not going to meet one on the street. Like IA, UX is a new term, and covers the whole 'visit' to a site. However, it also is applied to all apps and things. For example, Apple and Nokia and others, will all have UX people looking at the whole of a user interaction with their iphone or N900, etc. Anyways, nice posting, and as you say, sometimes you just gotta pop the question and see what happens.

Feb 02, 2010
mikeduguid said...
Take 100 coders, designers and creatives and stick in a pub. Ply with whisky and beer. The first 20 people to leave looking a bit unsteady, or the ones standing in the corner with nothing interesting to say - that's your UX people right there ;)
Feb 02, 2010
RyanRoberts said...
So that'll be the ones calling themselves "creatives".

Leave a comment...